Thursday, September 12, 2013

PPACA Finds Corporations Shafting Retirees


The Great Corporate Health Insurance Dump progressed, with the latest moves targeting over 65 retirees.  Retirees don't like change and face staggering complexity from this latest corporate shedding.  

The Daily Press reported

Shipyard retirees received a shock in the form of a letter regarding their health care last week. Newport News Shipyard, now a division of Huntington Ingalls Industries, informed Medicare-eligible retirees — those aged 65 and older — that they would no longer be part of the company's group plan, effective Jan. 1, 2014.
"It was just a total surprise," said Newport News resident Jack Gergely, 70, who retired from the shipyard 10 years ago.

Shipyard spokeswoman Christie R. Miller said the move to independent plans would reduce administration costs for the company.

In order to maintain nonstop supplemental coverage, the shipyard directed salaried retirees to contact Extend Health, a health-care benefits advisory company, which has conducted transitions in coverage for DuPont, GM, Ford, Honeywell, 3M and Caterpillar in recent years.

"I will say I think it's happening with a lot of companies," said Lisa Walker, a Medicare consultant for Bay Aging. The benefits advisory company takes inventory of retirees' personal information, health status and prescription medications, in order to help them find an individual supplemental insurance plan to best suit their needs.

"They've dumped us. They're acting like we want this," said Ashton Haywood of Hampton, who retired from the shipyard in July 2001. He referenced the letter that led with, "We have heard from Huntington Ingalls retirees that the one-size-fits-all Retiree Medicare Supplement Plan may not be meeting your individual needs." He expressed shock and disappointment. "Benefits are part of your pay. Current employees are taking a de facto pay cut. Their word means nothing," Haywood said. "God knows how much more it's going to cost us."

The Harris family has ties to the shipyard that span generations. "It's scary to go out and look for new insurance," said Newport News resident Shirley Harris, 75. Her husband, Wayne, retired from the shipyard after 35 years. "At least I feel I've taken care of you," he told her before he died from asbestosis, a couple of years later, in 2002. "We've had good coverage. At one time we didn't pay anything, including premiums," said Harris. "I don't know how it's going to affect us. We don't know if it will be more or less. Of course, it's not going to be the same," she added. Her brother and son-in-law also have multiple years of shipyard service between them.

Harris also expressed concern about those in poor health who might not be able to follow the requirements set out by Extend Health (soon to become Towers Watson) before making an appointment. Even if they can gather all the information they require — lists of doctors and prescriptions — the phone appointment is scheduled to take up to two hours. Additionally, each person must apply individually, so Medicare-eligible spouses must choose a separate plan for their 2014 benefits.

Huntington Ingalls is presenting the change as an opportunity for more flexibility, more choices, and the chance to customize plans. "In many cases, these plans will be offered at a lower cost," informed a letter signed by Bill Ermatinger of Huntington Ingalls.

After a pre-interview with Extend Health, Gergely was mostly worried about finding an insurance plan that included his current doctors. "This is almost like the HMOs. The biggest worry to me is how limited we're going to be. Our coverage is fantastic now," he said.

The Extend Health literature informed recipients that the information pertains to retirees, spouses of retirees, and surviving spouses of retirees who are 65 and older. Spouses under 65, and eligible dependent children, can remain on the Huntington Ingalls Retiree Health Plan, as long as the retiree signs up through Extend Health. Retirees are advised that if they do not enroll through Extend Health, they will not receive any Medicare supplemental coverage through Huntington Ingalls after December 2013, and their dependents younger than 65 would not be able to continue their coverage through the company; they may also be subject to Medicare Part D late enrollment penalties if their prescription drug coverage lapses.

"I can't go out and look on my own," said Haywood, whose wife is not yet 65.  Under the new arrangement, retirees who currently receive a company subsidy toward the cost of their Medicare Supplement Plan, will be enrolled in a Retiree Reimbursement Arrangement. The account can be used to pay for premiums for Medicare Parts B and D and also Medicare supplemental benefits; any remaining funds roll over at the end of the year.

All retirees affected will pay their premiums directly to the insurance provider, and those eligible for reimbursements will receive them through Extend Health rather than the shipyard.

Energizer employees not only will lose company health insurance but a $5,000 life insurance policy.

Retirees get complexity and increased responsibility at a time in their life when they may be least able to deal with it. 

This unsettling move will impact hundreds of thousands of retirees.  Corporations have the gall to pedal their shameless cost saving move as benefiting retirees.  How many retirees will fail to follow the rules and get signed up in the first place?  Is it 20%, 33%, maybe 50%?  How many, now in managed Medicare plans, can't navigate complexity to be seen by their physician?  If they're seen at all, how much will their personal responsibility go up? 

Management in America today uses false words to harm people.  In taking away they claim they're giving more.  It's not only widespread and disturbing.  It's sickening.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Texas Enterprise Fund to Get Audit


Governor Rick Perry's Texas Enterprise Fund report to the Legislature is full of the same lies and misrepresentations regarding a $35 million TEF award to Vought Aircraft Aviation in 2004, then owned by The Carlyle Group.

How would you like to have $35 million in Texas taxpayer money for over six years and not have to provide a single new job, much less the 3,000 promised?  That's what Vought did under Carlyle Group ownership years.  In 2010 Carlyle monetized Vought via a sale to Triumph, just as their first TEF report to the state came due.

I wrote Representative Drew Darby with my concerns in 2009, believing he had influence via his legislative subcommittee assignments.  After Darby wrote me back about oversight provisions (or lack thereof), Governor Perry renegotiated the deal in secrecy as Carlyle worked behind the scenes to sell Vought.

Vought, Carlyle Group, the City of Dallas weren't the only ones over-promising and under-delivering.  The Standard Times reported on local TEF recipient Hirschfeld Steel

Hirschfeld Industries received $500,000 from the Texas Enterprise Fund in 2008. The San Angelo-based company was set to produce 225 full-time jobs by 2013 with an annual payroll of $8 million and to invest $40 million in a new plant and expansion.

That was when Hirschfeld Industries had partnered with Martifer to make wind towers, but since then Martifer, a Portuguese company, left Hirschfeld and its plant in West Texas.

According to the latest compliance report Hirschfeld submitted at the beginning of the year, the company had produced 37 of the 225 jobs promised, with an average salary of $35,000 to $39,000.

The latest version of the contract states that Hirschfeld must pay back $861 in damages per job that it is short. It can also roll over credits from years when the company creates more jobs than the contract specifies.

Hirschfeld Industries has paid $264,000 in damages, according to a governor’s office report.

When asked about working with the state, Hirschfeld deferred comment to the state.
Latest version of the contract?  Does that mean Rick Perry renegotiated this deal as well in 2010?

In 2008 Hirschfeld's private equity investors and owners pulled $28.2 million from the firm in partner distributions.  Since money is fungible, did TEF's $500,000 go straight out as partner distributions?

Both Vought and Hirschfeld have deep pocket private equity owners.  Both sought public subsidy for their operations.  Neither wants to speak to their failures to provide the promised jobs or how they profited from TEF grants.

The Texas Legislature repeatedly allowed the Governor's office to persist in its lies and misrepresentations.  A hapless media couldn't find Perry's bald faced untruths during his Presidential run.  Let's hope an auditor offers more in accountability than the Legislature or the media.  Both have been sorely lacking.

Update 4-4-15:  The audit found Governor Rick Perry to be both hapless and unethical.   Vought Aircraft Industries never applied for their $35 million Texas Enterprise Fund grant. 

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Brief Pause in TTU's Community Cat War

TTU administration allowed a pause in Hugh Cronin's cat war to search for the missing and wounded under Drane Hall.  This good news is tempered by the revelation that Tech wants to drastically reduce its feral cat colony, from eleven feeding stations to one.  Apparently, TTU is incapable of learning from other university's experience, even two in its own system.

TTU Assistant Vice President Hugh Cronin cruelly ruled by brute force, ably supported by Tech mouthpiece Chris Cook.  New TTU President Duane Nellis indicated by silence that he sided with these two liars over Tech's longtime cat caretakers. 

President Nellis, who sat on his hands for an unhinged Hugh Cronin, will have the final say.  He will also be responsible for the severity of TTU's troubles from a slow-motion invasion of unaltered cats from nearby neighborhoods and migrating students.  This is predictable. 

Leaders can't manage what they don't understand and Texas Tech clearly does not understand.  Cats will find their way to TTU's campus.  Does the University want them fixed and managed or fertile and foraging for food?  All signs point to the latter.  

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

TTU's Riveting Way to Conduct Animal Cruelty


Texas Tech University twice assured the public there were no community cats imprisoned under Drane Hall.  At least twice TTU administrators were proven wrong.  Last week's question was:

"Why would Texas Tech, repeatedly told about cats barricaded without food or water, install privacy shields so the public could not view cats trapped in inhumane conditions?"


There is no animal cruelty without evidence of animal cruelty, that is until someone removed a cover.  Late last week TTU officials were proven again wrong.  TTU police received a report of animal cruelty.

What did an unhinged Hugh Cronin, Assistant Vice President of Facilities Management, do in response?  Rather than communicate and collaborate, as initially promised, Hugh ramped up the hardware, riveting in sheet metal and the cover grate. 


Tech should finally fulfill what Hugh Cronin was incapable of doing, honor its initial commitment to work with local animal service organizations on the safe and humane reduction of its longtime feral cat colony.  Hugh Cronin's gone.  His cat war should end.

Monday, September 02, 2013

Reporting TTU's Intended and Unintended Consequences


Texas Tech's "Do the Right Thing" program focused on ethics.  That means reporting concerns of animal cruelty, broken promises and outright lies by TTU administrators.   Such a report is below:



Those wishing to file reports based on their experiences and evidence can do so by clicking here.

Update:  Rather than install one way excluder doors that allow cats out but not back in, TTU's facilities management installed heavy duty anchors on the sheet metal barricades.  It's like fortifying cockpit doors with the pilots permanently trapped inside.  I'll post pictures soon.

Update 9-5-13:  Texas Tech gave the following response via Ethics Point:
"Sep 02, 2013, 1:54 PM  Comment: Thank you for using the Ethics Point reporting system and for your additional information. We are currently looking into this matter."  I then "requested "a formal reply to concerns stated in this report."

Sunday, September 01, 2013

San Angelo's Various Shhhh's!


San Angelo's already explosive growth may accelerate under a new Chamber marketing campaign included in the September 3rd City Council packet.  The City of San Angelo's website added two bid opportunities recently that reflect this growth.

The first juxtaposes our water resources vs. skyrocketing demand for water in the region.  The City requested bids for water treatment chemicals intent on having suppliers prove their product's capabilities.  This bid was cancelled due to low water levels in the Concho River.   It takes 3.5 million gallons to frack a well and 10,000 wells are expected to be drilled in our area over a decade or more.  Shhhhh!

The next item is curious in that the city seeks bids for temporary employee services for kitchen aides, office assistants and maintenance workers.  Bidders are to supply the city with a contracted labor rate per hour.

The City had 32 full-time vacancies and 29 part-time positions unfilled in July.  That month 20 employees voluntarily left city employment, with 16 leaving for higher paying jobs.  Human Resource representatives told Council turnover was the highest in five years.

The City stated in its temp bid:

Quantity - The exact requirements of all positions to be purchased under this bid cannot be determined at this time.

The City is not liable for Social Security contribution.  Additionally, the vendor is solely responsible for Unemployment Compensation.  

The vendor shall waive any “Temp to Hire” conversion fees charged in the event a temporary employee is selected by the City into fulltime trough the hiring process. 

The bid document also specified the type of pre-employment screening required and stipulated the vendor would provide a temp within 24 hours of a purchase order request.  The vendor is liable for any work provided without a P.O.   It will be interesting to see the hourly rates temp agencies charge the city.

It would behoove this council, concerned about city workers making a living wage, to inquire how much the agency will pay the actual worker.  It will also be informative to compare the city's pay scale for the three positions to vendor bids.

The City has major issues attracting and keeping employees.  That goes from the top, where an exodus occurred after Harold's reign ended, to the bottom, where the city seeks temps to fill holes and/or bypass providing benefits.  Shhhh!

Benefit savings can be seen in the health insurance budget for the coming year.  The only thing that could explain such a huge drop is the city is covering far fewer employees.  Is this a side effect of using temporary workers or the unstated aim?

This reminds me of the Chamber telling public officials that new companies for our area were told to bring their employees with them.  The Chamber did not want their higher pay rates impacting local companies.  Shhhh!

San Angelo leads.  The question is for whom?

MedHab's Official Product Launch


Today is the official launch date of MedHab LLC's first product, RPM2.  RPM2 is the retail version of StepRite, MedHab's hoped for medical device.  MedHab's summer 2012 production prediction slipped in at least two ways, time and scope.  The FDA is yet to approve StepRite.  Also, Medicare hasn't allowed for payment for StepRite for post surgical patients undergoing physical therapy.  MedHab made a strategic decision to launch the retail version.  RPM2 is now available on a pre-order basis.   

Update 9-4-13:  BioNewsTexas reported MedHab has been selling product for ten months now.  "Fort Worth-based startup RPM2 has launched its website and is offering its new athletic training product, which has been on the market to coaches and trainers for 10 months, available for retail sale to the public."