San Angelo's Animal Shelter Advisory Committee had five of its nine meetings cancelled thus far in 2018. The ASAC met in January, March, May and July. The last two meetings, August and September were cancelled.
City Council undertook three strategic decisions without input from the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, the most recent being approving $200,000 for garage expansion/processing room changes. Earlier this year the City contracted with Concho Valley PAWS for veterinary services and leased land to PAWS for an adoption center.
City Council not only missed input from ASAC members it limited the opportunity for public input in bypassing the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee.
After considerable discussion the Mayor did not ask for public comment. Council voted to award PAWS the contract for veterinary services. City Councilman Tommy Thompson asked if it would "get pets out of the shelter better, faster, more efficiously and get the capability to meet the guidelines we want as far as they are vaccinated and altered." Morgan said it would. She also stated "this is the solution to removing our pet overpopulation epidemic."
The strategic vision of PAWS adoption center has not been shared with the Animal Shelter Advisory Committee or the public. The land lease was not pulled for council discussion on May 2, 2018. It passed within the consent agenda for that meeting.
In the last City Council meeting Mayor Brenda Gunter pushed for the city to spend $200,000 on improvements to the current animal shelter building. This was embedded in a budget amendment. There was no discussion as to how the $200,000 fit into the Capital Improvement Plan priorities for the Animal Shelter. I haven't heard any discussion in Council strategic planning/budget sessions about Animal Services.
The Animal Shelter Advisory Committee assists with compliance with state law. Proposed facility changes fit within this scope of responsibility.
It would be difficult for a busy citizen or Animal Shelter Advisory Committee member to discern this shelter renovation/expansion was even on the agenda. Getting time off work to attend would've been the next hurdle for the aware.
I'm not sure the city could design a better system to keep planned animal service changes a secret from an interested public with its neutered Animal Services Advisory Committee and propensity to bury strategic animal services decisions within City Council procedures.
No comments:
Post a Comment