AI Finks Seemingly Everywhere

WIRED ran a story on the FBI and other federal agencies concerned about citizen resistance to data centers locating in their community.  

According to documents obtained by WIRED through public records requests, more than 1,000 pages of previously unpublished reports from Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and fusion centers show agencies increasingly tracking what they describe as anti-technology threats.

One report from the New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau warned that AI adoption could spark major unrest within the next five years and result in "anti-tech violent extremist activity."

This follows BlackRock's Larry Fink expressing concern that citizens would use drones to attack data centers.  Something very strange is going on given how quickly this language has accelerated.   

Fink landed in Texas this week and appeared with Governor Greg Abbott.  Larry went on to suggest public pension funds, retirement and savings accounts finance hyperscale data centers. 

 

Expressing one's opinion, asking government to be open and accountable, to balance the resource needs of citizens with economic development and seeking to minimize the transfer of public dollars to extremely wealthy corporations/corporate executives sounds like a basic right.  

Have those rights also been pledged to TechGods and the Lords of Capital by our elected officials?

I never thought I needed to shield my savings and retirement accounts from voracious AI data centers.  Thank God, Larry Fink warned me.  

Update 5-28-26:  My wise friend noted:

The accumulated savings of the people have been harnessed and softly commandeered through the narrative of investment for the likes of Larry Fink and his private equity/venture capital brethren as they funnel those flows into their mandates and increased wealth.  I wonder how many people would pay attention if their private marks (asset valuations) were revealed and the Federal Reserve finally just let the market clear. 

Larry began his career with a wipeout, It would be poetic justice if he ended his career the same way.

Government of, by and for the TechGods. the Lords of Capital and their political functionaries.  Finks everywhere.

Tom Green County Targeted, San Angelo Partnering

Three data centers have targeted Tom Green County for possible sites.  Beacon Data Centers is the only one to identify itself.  They hope to build a giant data center in Dove Creek.  Residents told them to go away.

The City of San Angelo has been far more accommodating, working a land deal/annexing the area (March 2005), changing the zoning to allow data centers (January 2026) and approving zoning regulations relative to data center development (May 2026).  Developer Skybox/Emergent promotes the project as "built for speed" and having "exceptional municipal support."  

Data Centers are needed for AI and are being brought to us by the same people that created addictive and harmful social media and other predatory apps.  

Our leaders want the public to trust the developer any potential AI occupant.  

No thank you.  Developers are backed by big money intent on making bigger money.  Promises mean nothing.  The project is intended to make bank for its private equity underwriter (PEU) sponsor.  If so, it will be flipped in a few years and the people who brought the project to our area will be gone.

It could middle along, in which case the developer has to hold onto to the project, tweaking it for regular cash siphoning.  

The project could fail miserably and its keys be handed back to creditors.  If creditors don't want it, it becomes the city's problem as an abandoned piece of property with lots of toxic heavy metal equipment and tainted cooling water.

Tom Green County residents need a government champion, whether it be local, regional or state, to level the imbalance of power and advantage.  Texas, like most states, is set up to encourage such development via layers of tax breaks, fast tracking permits and even direct subsidy.

San Angelo residents need brakes to stop the oncoming train so its engine defects can be examined and fail safe's installed that actually protect residents.  There needs to be significant monetary penalties for failed promises and actual community harm.

The developer would say "we are just the building."  That building will use the energy of 750,000 homes and house unreliable, even dangerous AI. 

I speak for many when I say our area does not need or want hyper-scale data centers with their voracious power and water needs, their inflation boosting impact on goods and housing and their profit obsessed PEU owners/funders.  

Someone owes us a square deal, not one where we pay and pay and pay, both in money and loss of quality of life.  

Update:  Lake Tahoe communities are facing the prospect of no electricity due to a supplier redirecting its power to data centers.

The data center boom is rapidly sucking Nevada’s power grid dry, with an estimated 22 percent of the state’s total electricity generation capacity going toward the behemoth computing centers in 2024.

Texas, are you listening to the rapidly sucking sound to our west? 

Update 5-26-26:  Business Insider ran a story on students booing graduation speakers over the mention of AI:

....the perception of AI among the public is low. A Pew Research Center study found that about half of Americans felt the increased prevalence of AI in their daily lives made them feel "more concerned than excited." Many Americans across the country, meanwhile, are resisting new data centers in their communities, which are essential to powering AI products like chatbots.

Oh, and the cost of compute will far exceed the cost of human employees according to NVIDIA's CEO..

Brutal Data Center Stats for Texas Water

Texas faces the prospect of 750 new data centers according to a presentation at the recent Milken Global Conference.  Currently 140 data centers are under construction and 610 have been announced.  It's not clear if San Angelo/Tom Green County's potential four data centers are in the count.  Likely not, so the number could grow much higher.

Beacon Data Centers is looking at Dove Creek in Tom Green County for a possible location.  Their website indicates one of their data centers under development would use 400 acre feet of water per year.  

They said they would not drill wells but use surface water from Spring Creek.  I don't see how that is possible given we live upstream and the creek goes dry solely from upstream irrigation.  They stop irrigating and the flow returns.  It's not nearly enough to sustain daily operations of a giant data center.

Take 750 new data centers at 400 acre feet per year once under operation and that's an additional 300,000 acre feet needed statewide.  That does not count the water needed for construction or for new workers' living needs during the construction period.

Consider this recent report from Politico:

The neighbors of a data center in Georgia are steaming after they discovered the facility had sucked up nearly 30 million gallons of water.... 

Outrage started bubbling up last year when residents of an affluent subdivision named Annelise Park in Fayetteville, Georgia, noticed their water pressure was unusually low.

The company said its water consumption was so high last year because of temporary construction-related activities, such as concrete work, dust control and site preparation

Water demands occur long before sites become operational.  That 30 million gallons equates to 92 acre feet.  Someone needs to model the water use of 750 additional Texas data centers during the construction period.   That's water for the work and for the workers who surely need showers at the end of the day.  

A recent story in the Houston Chronicle indicated Texas data centers would go from using less than 1% of the state's water to 9% by 2040.  At a minimum that's a tenfold increase.  The study was done by the University of Texas.

The State of Texas has thrown the door wide open for these facilities.  That is why there are so many coming.  The newfound reticence of elected officials may be real and it may be for show.  

San Angelo and Tom Green County have four data centers exploring sites.  The Skybox/Emergent in San Angelo seems pretty far along and is actively being marketed.  Beacon Data Centers expressed interest and met with the community, which clearly told them to look elsewhere.  The other two sites have not been named, by interested party or location in the county.   

The picture is brutal on water alone.  No responsible elected official could allow this to happen on such an obscene scale.  

Update 5-13-26:  A mega data center development named "The Stratos Project" in Utah was approved by Box Elder County commissioners.  

Box Elder County, Utah gets 17 inches of rain, on average, per year.

Average annual rainfall for San Angelo is 21 inches.   

Stratos has a long way to go to become fully operational:

Developers say they will begin raising capital within 60 days and aim to start initial phases within months. The data center would likely not be in operation for ten years.

How did a Shark have so much success that far inland, in an area with so little water?  It won because local and state leaders prioritized out of state corporate interests above the people who elected them.  They did so "because the Undersecretary of the Air Force asked them to."

San Angelo has Goodfellow Airforce Base, which trains military intelligence and firefighters across all of the military's branches.  As of now there is no state group coordinating project development, but that could change.

Update 5-18-26:  A future water source for the City of San Angelo is aquifer water from Fort Stockton Holdings.  Fort Stockton has its own data center boom,  How much water will be available when the city needs it due to Tom Green County's data center boom (should it be realized)?

Update 5-25-26:  TCD reported:

a draft of Texas' 2027 state water plan estimates the state will need roughly $174 billion in water infrastructure projects over the next 50 years to avoid severe regional shortages during drought. It mentions nothing, however, about data centers.

Sumter is Latest PEU Player

The big money boys have found San Angelo according to Chamber Vice President Michael Looney.  Private equity underwriters (PEU) are behind numerous projects in San Angelo, Tom Green County and the Concho Valley.

One even shared his history with private equity at the recent data center public meeting.  That was Emergent founder and CEO Chris Sumter.  

Sumter noted he was part of the team that founded Vantage Data Systems which became a Silver Lake affiliate in 2010.  That should have been Sumter's first windfall.

Next he did a data center in Santa Clara with Acore Capital.  Now he heads Emergent Data Centers which has primarily worked with Blue Owl for project financing.

It does not appear Emergent itself has a private equity sponsor, but these relationships are private and can remain opaque.

Many data center projects are financed through joint ventures between developers and institutional equity investors, including pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and infrastructure-focused private equity sponsors. The developer typically contributes expertise, entitlements, and project management capabilities while the equity partner provides the majority of the capital.

Sumter is the developer with the expertise and project management capabilities.  The City of San Angelo, Tom Green County and the State of Texas are contributors of entitlements (which can include incentives).  

Entitled sites offer a clear path to execution, reducing the uncertainty associated with early-stage development.

SA1 is promoted as "a municipal partnership built for speed" and having "exceptional municipal support."  Oddly, the City of San Angelo has no documents relative to that claim.

Representative Drew Darby made his position on data centers clear via a statement.  It closed with:

Texas taxpayers should not be subsidizing billion-dollar facilities. If a data center cannot pencil out without a government handout, that tells you something. I will support ending blanket tax abatements and redirecting those dollars toward the communities that actually bear the costs of this development. West Texas will never simply be a place to plant a server farm and hand the bill to ratepayers — not on my watch.

I hope that includes eliminating the current Texas sales tax break for the expensive equipment that fills these data centers.  Also, the U.S. Congress should finally eliminate private equity's preferred "carried interest taxation."  It has remained for decades despite widespread unpopularity.

The big money boys have found us and the only thing that will turn them away is charging them bigger money.  

Fire up the tax abatement and PEU preferred taxation grinders in the various Capital basements.  That vibration may be anathema to their hurdle rates.  Let the players play elsewhere.

Local Tax Abatements for Private Equity Backed Projects

The City of San Angelo officially renewed its tax abatement program at its last meeting.  Tom Green County has been active in that arena as well.  There are three recipients of such abatements, Apex Clean Energy, Peregrine Energy and Doral LLC.  All are owned by private equity underwriters (PEU).

Chamber Vice President Michael Looney informed the San Angelo Development Corporation Board that more private equity projects are interested in coming to the area.  He cited four data centers, the Skybox/Emergent effort in the city and three more in the county, with Beacon being the one identified to date.  

Skybox has been backed by Blue Owl Capital, which has had a difficult run of late as investors have fled its private credit offerings.  

Private equity affiliates pursue projects with the intent of increasing the future sale price of that company.  Their financial structure often is heavily debt funded which can cause a heavy interest burden in times of rising interest rates (as the rate tends to be variable) and difficult economic conditions (potentially with less revenue/higher costs).  

It is not unusual for a PEU affiliate to simply hand over the keys to the organization to lenders.  That is a consideration, as the timing for actual benefit to San Angelo citizens may coincide with the entity's stressed sale or closure. 

Promises of greater local taxes three to five years down the road may or may not materialize.  The State of Texas already ensured sales taxes on the billions ($) in expensive servers will not be paid.  Think about that the next time you have to replace your computer, phone or laptop.  

Politicians Red & Blue love PEU and increasingly, more are one.  The national trend has become local.  It's a sad day to see.  

SA1 Data Center Has Giant Hat, City Provides No Meat

The following public information request was submitted on April 27th.

“Please provide documents relative to the following information from Emergent Data Centers that references the City of San Angelo: Municipal Partnership Built for Speed 

"San Angelo has annexed the site and fast-tracked data center zoning by-right. The city has confirmed water and sewer capacity for full-scale development. This is a city-backed infrastructure project with committed resources."  

The document also states the City of San Angelo is providing "exceptional municipal support." Please provide documents delineating this exceptional municipal support. Thank you.” 

On April 29th city staff asked for clarification:'

This letter is to clarify what information you are seeking from the City of San Angelo. 

PLEASE CLARIFY THE DOCUMENTS YOU ARE REQUESTING.

On May 1st I replied with:

I request documents delineating the "committed resources" to this "city-backed infrastructure project" (Emergent/Skybox Data Center). Also, I request the specific levels of service the city is providing Emergent/Skybox to achieve the "exceptional municipal support" level, As the partnership is "built for speed" I request a projected timeline with key development steps and an anticipated start date. Thank you.

This morning I received:

The City of San Angelo has reviewed its files and has determined there are no responsive documents to your request.

No documents for a "city backed infrastructure project with committed resources."  How can that be?

Citizens Speak on Emergent/Skybox's SAI

 

The above video is cued to begin with citizen comment from the 4-22-26 public meeting on the Skybox/Emergent Data Center project in northeast San Angelo.  

Prior to public comment Mayor Thompson interviewed two gentlemen from Emergent Data Centers, Skybox's developer/sales agent.  The project is marketed as having "exceptional municipal support" and a "municipal partnership built for speed."

As someone who has tried to get information on economic development incentives since December 2025 I'd like to add "secrecy" to "speed."  I submitted that question for the public meeting but leadership chose not to address it in their infomercial.  

I had to leave as public comment was starting as I needed to go home and take care of animals.  I must say residents of San Angelo, Abilene Tom Green and surrounding counties spoke eloquently and passionately.  Bravo.  The video is worth watching.

The meeting deteriorated at the end when San Angelo Live's Joe Hyde chose to insult the crowd.

If that's your champion, I'm not sure you are on the right side.  Hyde ran for Tom Green County Judge against Lane Carter but lost.

Mayor Thompson did not have Hyde escorted out, instead Tom closed with:

"We are finished with public comment. Thank goodness." 

Box checked.  I'm afraid that means it's over.  

Dove Creek's Shawn Nanny (Tom Green County Commissioner) spoke simply and passionately against Beacon Data Centers locating in his community.  San Angelo's Joe Hyde trashed a public meeting with name calling against people doing the same as Nanny.  

It's a stain that taints and that may have been the aim.  End the show with a dookie. 

Note:  There are four data centers under consideration, one in San Angelo and three more in Tom Green County (source:  COSADC board meeting presentation by Michael Looney on 4-8-26).  

Tom Green County is asking for the ability to act on behalf of its citizens in shepherding local resources, water, power, etc..

The initial post had Joe Hyde as a mayoral candidate against Thompson.  That was incorrect and the post updated to show Hyde ran for County Judge but lost.  Had he won he might be shepherding the development of three data centers and not asking the state legislature for the ability to protect citizens from data center harm. 12:10 pm on 4-24-26

Update 5-4-26:  San Angelo City Council will entertain an agenda item on data center zoning in tomorrow's Council meeting.  I expect citizens will want to speak as that is their right.  Hopefully, Joe Hyde will keep his remarks on the positives of data centers and why he is such an advocate.  His trashing of his peers was a sorry display from someone who'd hoped to serve the public.

Emergent Data Center Show at McNease Convention Center

San Angelo Mayor Tom Thompson interviewed two executives from Emergent Data Center, CEO Chris Sumter and Chief Technology Officer Mike Coleman, about the proposed Skybox Data Center project in the Northeast portion of town.  This followed a presentation by Planning & Development Director Aaron Vannoy on ordinance changes based on development research from other communities with current and proposed data centers.

The Mayor's structured interview covered the following areas:

• Emergent Executives background
• Why San Angelo
• Water Use
• Noise Mitigation
• Construction
• Operation - jobs created
• Grid - electricity impact
• Community responsibility
• Tax revenue (no specifics given)

The panel discussion had several explicit sales pitches embedded in it as well as promises to solve any problems that arose.  There was no indication that any panel member thought the project itself was problematic for San Angelo and this part of West Texas.  

Not addressed by the panel or the city's planning director:  economic development incentives currently under consideration for the project.  

I submitted that question on April 9th using the online form:

Please provide information about any public subsidies, direct or indirect, that the city is providing or plans to consider to support the development of the Skybox/Emergent Data Center. I submitted a public information request to this effect in December 2025 but have received no response at the City of San Angelo appealed to the Texas Attorney General to keep such information confidential.

It's interesting that city leaders can share research on design parameters from other cities but not on economic development incentives.  Last night's meeting would have been the perfect opportunity for city leaders to share their thinking in this arena.  They expressly have not to date and likely won't until it goes before Council for an up or down vote.  The hint that tax breaks will be included is the five to six year time frame to accrue community financial benefit.

I did learn that Chris Sumter started Emergent after a meeting with a private equity firm, something like Emphoric Capital.  Also, the city may steer its reclaimed water to the project (away from Wall farmers).  Whoever Emergent/Skybox leases the data center to may or may not pay sales taxes on the equipment they place in the facility (currently a State of Texas tax break).  The Mayor said it is not the city's right to demand anything from the company in terms of good community relations.

The city posted documents relative to the meeting/project.  Emergent mentioned "exceptional municipal support" and a "municipal partnership built for speed."

That bodes poorly for those wishing a moratorium on data center construction, requests made at the April 21st City Council meeting (as well as over the last six months).  

On April 8th Chamber Vice President  Michael Looney informed the City of San Angelo Development Corporation board that four data centers are shopping locally, Emergent in city limits and three others outside the city in Tom Green County.  In that same meeting Looney cited the potential to "brand San Angelo as a potential location for other data centers."

I was unable to stay for the public comment portion of the meeting but hope to view the video.  At least I got to hear the commercial.  

Dove Creek Tells Beacon Data Centers to Go Elsewhere

A crowd of several hundred showed up for Beacon Data Centers' public meeting on their proposed Dove Creek Technology Campus project.  Virtually all were in opposition, including Tom Green County Commissioner Shawn Nanny.

Four56 Church hosted the meeting and their pastor shared information about the church and the kind of behavior decent people show one other.  

Beacon's representatives led with their intention of being a good steward.  Mark Attinger of The Attinger Group and Attinger Construction served as the local face for the project.  

Co-founder and Executive Vice President of Origination Joseph Shovlin was the Irish voice of Beacon, an affiliate of Nadia Partners.  

They stated their intent to be involved in the community and fund important infrastructure projects/local organizations.  They also made it clear they wanted to hear community concerns so the project could take those wishes into account early in the design phase.  And then they opened it up for questions.

The first question arose around noise levels.  EVP Shovlin said they were not prepared to discuss specifics at this stage in the project development as they had not even determined the size of the project or where it would be sited on the property, which is a large tract at the corner of Highway 67 South (between San Angelo and Mertzon) and FM Road 2335.

  

At that point attendees got the impression that few actual details would be shared in the major concern areas of noise, traffic, electricity, water, wastewater treatment, impact on property values, local economy, emissions and infrastructure needs.  

And they were mostly correct in that conclusion, however the following notable items were shared:

Water - At this stage they believe their water needs will be met from the existing water rights to several hundred acre feet from Spring Creek, dam reconstruction, mesquite eradication and rainwater harvesting.  They said their are no plans to utilize groundwater.  Surface water means the Concho River Watermaster and TCEQ.  Apparently there are two diversion points, one on each side of the creek of the existing property.

I spoke with Vice President of Corporate Affairs Lauren Armstrong after the meeting and shared the vagaries of surface water dependability in West Texas.  We lose creek flow completely due to upstream irrigation.  The irrigation stops and the creek flows again.  And we are far closer to the headwaters than Beacon's site.  That said, there are springs up and down the creek but many spots are dry for months at a time upstream of the Dove Creek Technology Campus.  She said they would haul in water for their daily needs if needed.

"We are not for sale." 

Power - The Beacon model is 100% natural gas turbine power generation.  They need to tie into a natural gas pipeline and that is part of the project's feasibility assessment.  

"Go away."

Wastewater - There would be a wastewater treatment facility onsite.

"We don't want you."

Traffic - There would be no access to the property down 2335.  The entrance would be just after the railroad tracks and new roads would be built within the property to meet their construction and operating needs.  They floated a reworking of the dangerous curve at 67 & 2335 as a public benefit of the project.

"Please leave us alone." 

Beacon will complete their environmental studies over the next four months (traffic, noise, emissions, water, wastewater) and share the results.  

Meanwhile they will take into account the information shared in the community meeting, all except "go away."  After all they are developers and Texas officials have said the state is open for business.

Update:  ConchoValleyHomepage ran a story on the meeting.

Update 4-18-26:  One Texas water well driller is worried about the impact of data centers.

Dove Creek Next for Data Center?

Concho Valley Homepage reported on the prospect of another data center, this time in Dove Creek.  Beacon Data Centers is considering building a data center in this rural area and will hold a community meeting at a local church.    

The meeting is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, April 16, at The Four56 Church, located at 13218 Westcross Lane. 

Beacon is backed by Nadia Partners, a Canadian private equity underwriter (PEU).  Nadia has another affiliate, Dromore Energy, that does solar power with battery storage.  

It happens that two projects, Dove Creek Solar and Dove Creek Storage are active projects under ERCOT and both expect a June 2028 completion date.

There is no information indicating these projects are part of the Dromore Energy portfolio, however their existence makes the AI data center more attractive.

Dove Creek has very limited fire/emergency response capabilities relative to those needed by a data center or a battery storage facility, should either catch on fire.  Water is more limited, as well.  

County Commissioner Shawn Nanny plans to attend.  The article quoted Nanny:

“I told them I am getting phone calls left and right, I don’t have any information to give them,” Nanny said. “I told them ya’ll have got to have one meeting immediately followed up by several meetings, but the ball is in their court. I am not conducting this meeting; the only say-so I had was please have a meeting so the people can hear about you.”

Citizens need to hear from County officials as well regarding public infrastructure needed to support such data centers.  That includes County Judge Lane Carter, Commissioner Nanny and County Emergency Response leadership.  

Dove Creek residents should not be managing all aspects of data center development alone.  Elected officials cannot abdicate their responsibility to balance data center desires with community needs and priorities.  One key priority is affordable water and electricity.  At a minimum, Tom Green County officials should be there to speak to that.

Update 4-15-26:   The land is between two surface water sources for the City of San Angelo, Dove Creek and Spring Creek.  

The State of Texas allows landowners to drill wells and potentially take as much as they want.  

In Texas, corporations have significant rights to pump groundwater under the "Rule of Capture," allowing unlimited use for beneficial purposes unless limited by local Groundwater Conservation Districts (GCDs).

It remains to be seen if the Dove Creek location falls within an existing Groundwater Conservation District.   

The site is either just inside the Lipan-Kickapoo WCD or just outside it.

Update 4-16-26:  The community of Dove Creek expressed their near universal opposition to the Beacon AI data center.  County Commissioner Shawn Nanny closed public feedback by joining his constituents in opposing the project.  

Kerr County Disaster Coordinator Retires March 31st

Houston Public Media reported:

Kerr County’s emergency coordinator, Will Thomas, said he was ill and asleep as floodwaters began to rise and didn’t participate in early response calls on July 3. Kerr County Sheriff Larry Leitha also said he was asleep as the river rose, while Kerr County Judge Rob Kelly, who oversees emergency management, said he was out of town.

And no first responder went to their home and knocked on the door?

William "Dub" Thomas is retiring effective March 31, 2026.   County Judge Rob Kelly, also retiring, said they would miss Dub and that Dub cannot be replaced.  I would say as Emergency Management Coordinator Dub was critical to the "asleep, asleep, out of town" leadership approach to the County's flood disaster response on July 4, 2025.

The first disaster was the abject failure to respond, to set up a command post and coordinate efforts in a timely manner.  The second was a failure of communication regarding actions not taken and not holding responsible people accountable.  The third was a failure to drill for flash flooding under Dub's tenure (as the County could produce no documents of such).

The County and Dub are yet to release their "after action" report on the July 4th flood disaster.  Conducting such evaluations are a basic in the emergency response arena.   It could happen in the next four days, but I doubt it.  This transitioned to an accountability avoidance/liability minimization exercise long ago.  

These are the words that welcomed Dub to his role with Kerr County in 2015:

This is very important, the position that Dub has as Emergency Management Coordinator. The City has an Emergency Management Coordinator; now the County has an Emergency Management Coordinator. These are the guys that are literally in charge if there's an emergency, a major fire,  major flood or whatever. And as the Sheriff pointed out the other day, the document is this thing, so Dub helped to  prepare that. So, I think this county, with Dub in place, and with the city there, it's taken us a year to redo this thing, but I think this county is going to have the best emergency management plan probably in the state. So, welcome, Dub.

Those words did not hold up so well.  All hat (plan), no cattle (implementation-flood drill or actual response). 

Update 3-30-26:  Hill Country Community Journal reported:

Thomas was authorized to purchase his county service weapon, a Glock 45, for $100 under a state law permitting such sales to honorably retired law enforcement officers.

Update 4-15-26:  A director of Camp Mystic testified that he:

"had not seen the official weather warnings before the storm, did not convene a staff meeting about the potential flooding and acknowledged that the camp did not have a detailed, written flood evacuation plan."

The cascade of ignorance and lack of preparation was widespread in Kerr County. 

Update 4-16-26:  The Texas Rangers have joined the case regarding camper deaths at Camp Mystic.  So far, local emergency officials inability to do their job has been overlooked by investigators.  Kerr County is yet to release an after action report on their disaster "response" on July 4, 2025.

Update 4-20-26:  Texas Tribune reported Camp Mystic's security guard testified as to events that evening/early morning:

The security guard at Camp Mystic the night of last year’s deadly flood acknowledged Wednesday that if a general evacuation order came early in the storm, lives could’ve been saved.

Update 4-22-26:  KXAN reported: 

According to the House’s resolution, the committee would be tasked with investigating contributing factors, allocation of resources, effectiveness of preparedness and effectiveness of response and coordination between local, state and federal entities. The Senate’s resolution called for a broader “complete and thorough examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding the flooding events.”

So how did this broad mandate get reduced to summer camps?   It appears there may never be an assessment of Kerr County emergency official's response (non-response) to the disaster. 

Update 5-21-26:  The National Weather Service released a report on the July 4th floods specific to Kerr County.  It states:

....attempted to call both the Kerr County emergency management coordinator and the sheriff’s office starting at approximately 3:38 a.m. but were unable to reach the sheriff’s office until 4:32 a.m. and the emergency management coordinator until 6:19 a.m.

Kerr County officials released their communications that day which show a non-responsiveness to the scope and scale of the disaster.

SA1 Data Center Has Layers

Chamber Executive Michael Looney informed the Development Corporation that the data center project needed work locally (on the 380 economic development agreement) and at the state level (approval for the plan to provide power/electricity for the project).  

Looney also talked about the recent Economic Summit, which had a panel on the data center project.  Mayor Tom Thompson moderated the panel with three representatives from Emergent Data Centers. 

Looney did not mention the data center at all in the Economic Summit section of his report.  

Emergent is actively marketing the San Angelo data center project to potential users.

Their documentation cites major solar generation projects in the area and the opportunity to contract directly for that power.  Meta is buying the power produced by Apex Clean Energy's solar farm in Tom Green County.  Apex is backed by Ares Management.

Looney also informed the Development Corporation that Peregrine Energy's battery farm would begin construction in Q4 2027.  Council gave that project an 85% tax abatement for three years.  Peregrine is backed by KKR.

Doral Renewables is behind another solar farm in the area.  Doral is backed by Apollo.

Skybox projects in other areas have been funded by BlueOwl, which has had a rough go of late.  Looney has frequently cited private equity (Ares, KKR, Apollo, Blueowl) as being very interested in our area.  There is currently a private equity funded spec building project in the Industrial Park.  

City Council took up leasing the land for the proposed Skybox/Emergent data center for $1 million per year beginning November 1, 2026.  The City already has a letter of agreement with Skybox for the possible sale of the land.  The State of Texas needs more than a letter of agreement to provide power via ERCOT and AEP, thus the lease.  

All lease proceeds will go towards the purchase price.  

Emergent's CEO offered the following during the Chamber's Economic Summit:

"It's the Skybox project and Emergent is the developer."

"We're looking for a home to build a campus for one of the Big Five (Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Google) .... one will lease the building from us.... We will be building for the next seven years."

As for the specific usage and the servers purchased, that will be determined by the eventual occupant.  

The public should know that there are three potential recipients of subsidies and tax breaks, Skybox, Emergent and the final occupant.  The 380 agreement is under negotiation between the City and Skybox.  

Once Emergent is successful in landing one of the Big Five, that company may request subsidies and/or tax breaks as their investment will be magnitudes greater than the buildings themselves. 

This data center project has layers.  Critical elements remain that need to be addressed for it to move forward.   

A Texas State Senator (Red Team) called for an immediate pause in data center development.  Issues cited include water, power and transparency.  The Senator called for the pause so "rural areas can evaluate effects on critical resources and infrastructure."

Update:  An Ohio Senator (Red Team) called out The Carlyle Group, another PEU, for accepting a  "$4.5 million state tax break for a data center expansion project in Northeast Ohio. Despite Carlyle’s investment, the project will only create ten new jobs."

Update 3-21-26:  ConchoValleyHomepage did a story on City Council's approval of the land lease to our possible data center.  

Update 4-8-26:  Add Nadia Partners and its affiliate Beacon AI Centers to the list of private equity underwriter (PEU) projects.  Beacon will be meeting with Dove Creek residents about a possible project.  

Water is a much greater issue for a rural area which does not have access to numerous water sources (like the City of San Angelo).  Nadia has another affiliate that develops solar power and battery storage, Dromore Energy.

Update 4-16-26:  Beacon AI public meeting is scheduled for this evening at the Four56 Church in Dove Creek.  The Skybox/Emergent data center public meeting is scheduled for 4-22 at 5:00 pm at the McNease Convention Center.  

Skybox Backing Out of Land Purchase?

Skybox Data Centers may not buy that 350 acres northeast of town for $17.4 million after all.  City Council has a possible lease of the land to San Angelo Data Center Campus Power LLC on its closed agenda for their March 17 meeting.

One year ago this same City Council approved a letter of intent to sell the land to Skybox Data Centers for $50,000 per acre.  This has not happened.  

Data center financing has become more problematic given the obscene sums of money required.  BlueOwl, a funder of other Skybox projects, has had a difficult run this year.  That means less capital for projects.  Asking the city to avoid the $17.4 million land sale and provide a reasonable lease amount could save big money on the project.  It also takes away a financial plum for pursuing the project.

Mayor Tom Thompson has said that people need to wait for the 380 (economic development) agreement, which many assumed would be after or in conjunction with the land sale.  

The big money behind these projects, solar/battery, data centers, often want to get out within 5-7 years with a handsome profit.  If the city keeps and leases the land, in ten years it may have a giant eyesore for which it is responsible.  Time will tell, unless there is a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).  An NDA could keep all but a few people in the dark forever.  

Update:  Chamber Executive Michael Looney spoke at the Development Corporation and shared that the 380 economic development agreement with Skybox needs a lot more work and that the state needs to respond to the project's power request/proposal.  Apparently, things are on track and a property lease enables progress to be made while those two fronts, the 380 and state power approval via ERCOT and AEP.

Skybox is the owner of the project and Emergent Data Centers is the developer.  Members of the Emergent Team were interviewed by the Mayor at the Economic Development Summit put on by the Chamber.

Gas Price Up $1 per Gallon

Sam's Club Gas price:

Feb. 27 - $2.33 per gallon

Day 1 of attack on Iran by U.S. and its 51st state Israel:

Feb. 28 - $2.59

Afterward:

March 4 - $2.93

March 9 - $3.13

March 11 - $3.33 per gallon

As of this morning San Angelo has experienced a $1.00 per gallon rise which is a 43% increase.  That happened in less than two weeks.  

Update 3-14-26:  The President flip flopped on his gas price stance.  What once was bad is now good....

Update 3-19-26:  Sam's Club gas price as of this morning is $3.70 per gallon.  The administration said gas prices should return to normal in a few more weeks.

Update 4-13-26:  Several days ago I drove past Sam's Club and the sign showed $4.01 per gallon.

Update 5-6-26:  I filled up at Sam's Club this morning for $3.91 per gallon.

Update 5-20-26:  Sam's sold regular gas today for $4.12 per gallon.  I filled up the day before at $3.96 a gallon.

Skybox Website Shows Wichita Falls PowerCampus

Skybox has a video of its Wichita Falls "PowerCampus Texas" project on its website.  The project is in conjunction with Blue Owl, which recently stopped early redemptions at one fund in response to investor requests

The design of the Wichita Falls PowerCampus accommodates AI and machine learning.

Skybox is "committed to being a transparent and collaborative partner."  They have a lot of work to do in that arena if they actually come to San Angelo.

Update 3-8-26:  San Marcos voted against zoning for a data center for the second time.  The item can come before their city council again in six months.  

San Angelo City Council could not get Skybox to make a presentation at their evening meeting on February 17th when the company was in town for a Chamber of Commerce event.

The news keeps getting worse for Blue Owl, the potential lender for San Angelo's data center.

Waiting on the 380 with Skybox

San Angelo City Council directed staff in regard to conditional use zoning standards for data centers.  Numerous citizens spoke during public comment with many encouraging Council to utilize a formal development process like Round Rock, Texas.  

Skybox presented earlier today at a Chamber of Commerce event (with paid registration) but did not appear at City Council (which citizens may attend at no charge).  

Mayor Tom Thompson closed the data center agenda item with "the rules are the rules and we set forward with that with the 380."  The 380 is an economic development agreement.  

I submitted a public information request for economic development documents on December 8, 2025.  

Please provide documents, communications, emails and texts relative to the City of San Angelo's economic development arrangement with Skybox Data Centers or whichever legal entity is developing the data center on former city land within the City Farm area in the northeast portion of town. 

This information could include a projected timeline, specific financial or tax incentives, and any other inducements, monetary or in-kind services. 

The Development Corporation website mentions the project with its statement: "Facilitated data center site development tied to renewable energy access." My request is relative to this specific City of San Angelo effort

The City petitioned the Attorney General to keep all relevant documents confidential and away from public view.  

Only the City knows how comprehensive their Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is with Skybox.  Rest assured, Skybox has employed the best lawyers to keep their information, even the most basic, private.  

After Tom Thompson referenced the 380 which is under tight lock and key, it felt like Council had picked out the attire and hair style for the person (Skybox) who might rob you later (higher electricity and water bills).   

Public subsidies are yet to be explored by this council.  I don't see how they can give Skybox tax breaks (or more) without sharing something.  

Update 2-19-26:  When asked about what information cannot be shared per any signed Non Disclosure Agreement and who from the city had signed such a NDA with Skybox the city replied:

The City of San Angelo has reviewed its files and has determined there are no responsive documents to your request.

And this applies to contracted entities as well?  Here is the specific language of my request:

Please share documents which indicate the scope of information to be kept confidential under the City of San Angelo's non-disclosure agreement with Skybox Data Centers. Also, please share the names of City officials, employed and elected who have signed the NDA with Skybox. I am not asking for the agreement itself, only who signed it on behalf of the city and what information areas are to be kept confidential. 

Should former Assistant City Manager and Interim Economic Development Director Michael Dane have a role in this project for either side, please share his specific role.

Update 3-16-26:  BlueOwl has financed a number of Skybox's data centers.  BlueOwl has been having a rougher time of late.  This may or may not impact financing for the San Angelo project.  

Update 4-28-26:  The City of San Angelo informed local media that no members of City Council have signed non-disclosure agreements relative to the proposed data center.  Mayor Thompson has acted as if there is confidential information he is not allowed to share by using words like "I think I can say this"  or "this number is already out there."  We will see if this holds in the future should the parties sign an actual agreement.

Data Center Sound Requirements Have Giant Loophole

San Angelo City Council will entertain design recommendations for data centers in this evening's meeting.  Council members are likely attending the presentation by SkyBox Data Centers at a Chamber of Commerce event today.  

The U.S. Department of Energy recently enacted such an emergency for backup power generators: 

Currently, there are tens of gigawatts of readily available backup generation that have remained largely untapped until now. Deployment of backup generation resources (whether auxiliary, standby, directly-connected, battery storage or other, and whether synchronized or not to the bulk power system) at data centers (including but not limited to hyperscaler facilities), and at other large load industrial and commercial customer sites, can prevent avoidable blackouts, thereby saving lives and reducing costs to the American people. The employment of this backup generation is expected to reduce stress on the grid. 

This will permit orderly, safe, and secure operations during Winter Storm Fern. Consistent with my letter issued on January 22, 2026, ERCOT requested today that DOE issue an order pursuant to FPA section 202(c) to allow the deployment of backup generation during emergency conditions.

By overtaxing the Texas energy grid, data centers can fire up their generators and sell power back through ERCOT.  

Abilene's giant AI facility started as a Bitcoin mining energy arbitrage play on stranded cheap renewable power.  It happened to be in the right place at the right time to get scooped up into Trump II's White House AI initiative "Stargate."   

Anyone care to hear what 160 emergency generators sound like when they are all fired up?  Anyone else want to be downwind of their emissions?  

We used to smell the rendering plant when the wind blew from the northeast.  What will an energy emergency smell like in San Angelo's future?

TechGods bring a different kind of rendering which includes massive amounts of garbage from the internet.  I expect this next round to be no different than their contributions to date.

Update 3-21-26:  The public should be aware of TechGod's impact on our country's youth:

Heavy social media use contributes to a stark decline in well-being among young people, with the effects particularly worrying in teenage girls in English-speaking countries and Western Europe

And this we wish to export to other parts of the globe.

Kerr County Emergency Officials Confused on July 4th

Text messages revealed how long emergency response was delayed in the deadly Kerr County July 4th flash flood.  Officials paid to respond to disasters were difficult to reach or not available when needed.

Kerr County is yet to release an after action report on their response to the flash flood.  County Commissioners raised the need to do one back in August 2025.  

The County has a plan to respond to flood disasters.  How did that plan work on July 4th?  It's long past time for the public to be informed of official actions vs. those specified in the disaster plan.  Not doing an evaluation would be yet another abdication of responsibility.  

The banquet of non-consequences continues.  Competent leadership must be a thing of the past.

Update 4-15-26:  A director of Camp Mystic testified that he:

"had not seen the official weather warnings before the storm, did not convene a staff meeting about the potential flooding and acknowledged that the camp did not have a detailed, written flood evacuation plan."

The cascade of ignorance and lack of preparation was widespread in Kerr County.

Update 4-20-26:  Texas Tribune reported Camp Mystic's security guard testified as to events that evening/early morning:

The security guard at Camp Mystic the night of last year’s deadly flood acknowledged Wednesday that if a general evacuation order came early in the storm, lives could’ve been saved.

Update 4-22-26:  KXAN reported: 

According to the House’s resolution, the committee would be tasked with investigating contributing factors, allocation of resources, effectiveness of preparedness and effectiveness of response and coordination between local, state and federal entities. The Senate’s resolution called for a broader “complete and thorough examination of the facts and circumstances surrounding the flooding events.”

So how did this broad mandate get reduced to summer camps?   It appears there may never be an assessment of Kerr County emergency official's response (non-response) to the disaster. 

Update 5-21-26:  The National Weather Service released a report on the July 4th floods specific to Kerr County.  It states:

....attempted to call both the Kerr County emergency management coordinator and the sheriff’s office starting at approximately 3:38 a.m. but were unable to reach the sheriff’s office until 4:32 a.m. and the emergency management coordinator until 6:19 a.m.

Kerr County officials released their communications that day which show a non-responsiveness to the scope and scale of the disaster.

Citizens Have to Pony Up to Learn about Skybox

The City of San Angelo discussed Skybox Data Centers in closed/executive session today.  Mayor Pro Tem Tommy Hiebert stated "there are no announcements coming out of executive session."  

Public comment at the beginning of the meeting included several citizens who encouraged the city to fulfill its public information obligation and provide documents relative to the project that the city is not asking be exempt from public disclosure, a process involving the Texas Attorney General's office.  

I submitted a Public Information Request on Skybox on December 8, 2025.  As of today, the city has provided no documents other than the Attorney General letter requesting exemption.  

Citizens have been told that Skybox officials will make a presentation on the project.  It will occur within a Chamber of Commerce event on February 17th.  Ticket prices are $49 for Chamber members, $59 for non-members and $500 for a table of eight.  

City leaders have shared what Skybox has allowed them to share.  It is strange to hear Mayor Tom Thompson refer to numbers he has heard as being out in the public.  Apparently, he cannot stray and reveal numbers that are not yet out there in response to citizen questions and concerns.  

The City added a presentation from Skybox to its Data Center webpage.  One slide shows:

The company's attempt to debunk data center secrecy may need to involve more than a Chamber of Commerce event requiring payment to hear the presentation.  

City leaders should make it clear the information citizens deserve on this project and present such information themselves.  That has not yet happened.  

City Council will meet on February 17th but not at its usual time of 8:30 am.  The meeting will begin at 5:30 pm,  Look for Skybox to be on the agenda since their leadership will be in town.

In our non-disclosure agreement (NDA) world it's the business' right to share whatever information they desire with the public.  Government officials give up that obligation as part of the economic development recruiting courtship where giant incentives are often offered.