It's One of Many

The City of San Angelo has designed and implemented Animal Services policies and practices that are maddening.  Responsible people are treated like criminals and irresponsible pet owners have a perpetual free pass.

This sleight of hand is accomplished with a cadre of partners.

The failure to accept loose dogs has had significant public health impact with large increases in "animal to people" bites and "dog on dog" attacks.  Those attacks severely harmed children, the disabled and even a trained Animal Control Officer.  

This is why there is an Animal Services & Control Taskforce.  Six years of "managed intake" turned into "no intake."  The shelter accepted 22 dogs via owner surrender in FY 24.  In 2016 the Animal Shelter accepted 2,920 owner surrenders of all types.  The difference (over eight years) did not all end up on city streets, but many did.  

You couldn't design a better system to "not serve" citizens.  And the Shelter Chief and City Council state otherwise.

Update 2-24-25:  Most members of City Council have been highly complimentary of shelter management and staff, ignoring the many voices that have expressed concerns over the years.  Most, but not all....

Update 2-26-25:  San Angelo is not the only community to be hoodwinked by BFAS, American Pets Alive and their local partner CVPAWS.  We do have six years of data, much of that in various posts on this blog.

El Paso saw a significant rise in stray animals, which caused public safety risks, health concerns, and stretched local animal services thin. As Ron Comeau, director of Lucy’s Dream Rescue, put it, “It’s going to take El Paso years to recover from Best Friends’ programs.”

Ditto for San Angelo...